Start with Palestine

Explained simply

Israel & Palestine

Explained simply.

No history degree required. Start at the beginning and follow how two national movements, an imperial power, repeated wars, displacement, occupation, failed diplomacy and political violence produced the reality people live with today.

24 chapters + evidenceSources includedNo assumed knowledge
Relief map of the eastern Mediterranean and southern Levant
Geographic context, not political borders. The region within the wider Ottoman Empire before the First World War.

A note before we start

This is not a story in which every claim has two equally supported versions. Some facts are firmly established. Some interpretations remain disputed. Some legal questions have authoritative answers, while others are still before courts.

The aim is not to manufacture a midpoint between competing narratives. It is to follow the strongest available evidence, describe uncertainty honestly and remember that Israelis and Palestinians are people, not interchangeable representatives of governments or armed groups.

How this site is researched

The story

From Ottoman rule to today

A land with many names and communities

For centuries, the territory between the Mediterranean Sea and the River Jordan belonged to larger empires. In the decades before the First World War it formed part of the Ottoman Empire, divided among several administrative districts rather than governed as a sovereign country called . Most inhabitants were Arabic-speaking Muslims and Christians. Jewish communities also lived in cities including Jerusalem, Hebron, Safed and Tiberias, alongside newer Jewish arrivals. The population was religiously and socially diverse, and identities such as Ottoman, Arab, Palestinian, Jewish, Muslim, Christian and local could overlap.

Two national movements take shape

Modern political emerged in late nineteenth-century Europe. Its supporters argued that Jews were not only a religious community but a people entitled to national self-determination, and that a Jewish homeland offered protection from entrenched and recurring violence. At the same time, Arabic-speaking inhabitants of were developing political identities shaped by local loyalties, Ottoman reform, Arab cultural revival and opposition to growing external control. A distinct Palestinian national consciousness did not appear on one day, but it was visible before the British Mandate.

Britain makes overlapping commitments

During the First World War, Britain made several commitments about the Ottoman Middle East to different audiences. Their wording and compatibility remain debated, but together they created expectations that could not easily be reconciled. In the 1917 Balfour Declaration, Britain supported “the establishment in of a national home for the Jewish people” while stating that nothing should prejudice the civil and religious rights of the country’s existing non-Jewish communities.

One country, two projects

Under the British Mandate, Jewish immigration, land purchase and institution-building expanded. The Jewish community, known as the Yishuv, developed elected bodies, schools, trade unions, health services and defence organisations that increasingly resembled the foundations of a state. Palestinian Arabs remained the majority and repeatedly demanded representative government and limits on immigration and land transfer. Britain resisted creating a legislature that would allow majority rule, partly because it would probably block the Zionist project Britain had promised to support.

The Arab Revolt changes the balance

Palestinian opposition erupted into a general strike and then an armed revolt against British rule and Zionist immigration. Rebels attacked British forces, Jewish communities and Palestinians accused of collaboration. Britain answered with a major counterinsurgency campaign.

The Holocaust makes refuge and statehood urgent

Nazi Germany and its allies murdered six million European Jews. The Holocaust did not begin the conflict in , but it transformed Jewish and international understanding of the danger of statelessness and the urgency of refuge.

The UN proposes splitting the land

UN General Assembly Resolution 181 recommended a Jewish state, an Arab state and an international regime for Jerusalem. Mainstream Zionist leaders accepted the plan as a basis for statehood. Palestinian Arab leaders and neighbouring Arab governments rejected it.

Independence for Israel, catastrophe for Palestinians

War began between Palestinian Arab and Jewish forces after the partition vote, months before neighbouring Arab armies entered. Israel declared independence on 14 May 1948. Egypt, Transjordan, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon intervened after the British Mandate ended. Israel survived, defeated the Arab armies and expanded beyond the UN’s proposed borders. No Palestinian Arab state emerged. Israel remembers national survival and independence. Palestinians remember the , Arabic for catastrophe.

Armistice was not peace

The 1949 agreements stopped the first Arab-Israeli war but did not settle borders, refugees or mutual recognition. Palestinians were divided among Israel, Jordanian-controlled and Egyptian-administered Gaza, while hundreds of thousands lived as refugees across the region.

Palestinians rebuild a national movement

The Liberation Organization was founded in 1964. It initially operated under strong Arab-state influence, but Palestinian guerrilla organisations, especially , soon became more powerful within it.

Six days reshape the map

In six days, Israel defeated Egypt, Jordan and Syria and captured the Sinai Peninsula, , , and Golan Heights. Israel’s territory under military control became more than three times larger.

A temporary occupation becomes a lasting system

Israel established military rule over millions of Palestinians in the and Gaza. It annexed in measures not recognised internationally and began building civilian s in occupied territory.

One peace agreement, another war

Egypt and Syria attacked Israeli forces in the occupied Sinai and Golan Heights in October 1973. The war shattered Israel’s sense of military invulnerability and eventually opened a dimatic route between Egypt and Israel.

An uprising from inside the occupied territories

The First began in Gaza in December 1987 and spread across the occupied territories. It involved demonstrations, strikes, tax resistance, boycotts, neighbourhood committees, stone-throwing and attacks on Israelis. Israeli forces responded with arrests, curfews, deportations, live fire and other force.

For a moment, peace looks possible

Israel and the formally recognised each other. The Oslo Accords created the and divided the into Areas A, B and C under different degrees of Palestinian and Israeli control.

The process continues while trust collapses

In November 1995, Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin was assassinated by a Jewish Israeli extremist opposed to Oslo. Palestinian armed groups carried out suicide bombings and other attacks on Israeli civilians. Israeli construction and the settler population continued to grow.

The conflict becomes far more lethal

After years of failed negotiations and rising frustration, Ariel Sharon’s visit to the contested holy site known to Muslims as al-Haram al-Sharif and to Jews as the Temple Mount helped trigger protests in September 2000. Israeli forces used lethal force; the uprising rapidly escalated.

Israel withdraws from inside Gaza, then Palestinian politics splits

In 2005, Israel removed its s and permanent ground forces from inside Gaza. In 2006, won a majority of seats in the Palestinian Legislative Council. After escalating conflict with , seized de facto control of Gaza in 2007.

Gaza is sealed off and war becomes cyclical

After took control of Gaza, Israel imposed a land, sea and air , and Egypt tightly restricted its crossing. Israel said the restrictions were necessary to prevent weapons reaching . The also constrained civilian movement, trade, construction, medical travel and the wider economy.

Pressure rises before the rupture

The -led attack did not emerge from calm, although nothing that preceded it excused attacks on civilians. The years before 7 October saw no meaningful peace process, continued expansion, deep Palestinian political division and recurring violence in Gaza, Jerusalem and the .

The Hamas-led attack

and other armed groups broke through the Gaza perimeter and attacked southern Israel. They assaulted civilian communities, military bases, roads and the Nova music festival. About 1,200 people were killed, according to revised Israeli figures, and 251 people were taken hostage.

The war transforms Gaza

Israel said its objectives were to destroy ’s military and governing capacity and return the hostages. It launched a large air campaign, imposed what its defence minister called a complete siege, ordered mass evacuations and sent ground forces into Gaza. The campaign killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, displaced almost the entire population and damaged or destroyed homes, hospitals, schools, universities, water systems, roads, farms, religious sites and cultural property.

The scale, with dates and definitions

Established / documented

Reported Palestinian deaths

OCHA relayed a Gaza Ministry of Health total of 73,669 by 9 September 2026.

Definition and limits: The UN attributes the figure to its source and does not claim to have independently verified every death. The total does not provide a complete civilian and combatant split.

Peer-reviewed estimate

Peer-reviewed mortality estimate

A 2026 population-representative survey estimated about 75,200 violent deaths and 8,450 excess non-violent deaths by 5 January 2025, with uncertainty ranges around both estimates.

Definition and limits: This is a statistical estimate for an earlier date, not a name-by-name count and not a current total. It suggests official wartime registration substantially undercounted deaths.

Peer-reviewed estimate

Earlier capture–recapture estimate

A peer-reviewed Lancet analysis estimated 64,260 traumatic-injury deaths through 30 June 2024, about 41 per cent above the ministry count available for that period.

Definition and limits: It did not estimate indirect deaths or identify combatant status.

Established / documented

Displacement and shelter

By September 2026, OCHA estimated 1.98 million people needed shelter assistance and 65 per cent of assessed households lived in tents or makeshift shelters.

Definition and limits: People were often displaced more than once, so movements exceed the number of unique people displaced.

Established / documented

Damage

OCHA reported that 82 per cent of structures were damaged or destroyed by June 2026 and 76.6 per cent of housing units were damaged or destroyed in an assessment issued in April 2026.

Definition and limits: Satellite and modelled assessments use categories of damage and may later be revised through ground verification.

Established / documented

Education

OCHA reported that about 93 per cent of school buildings would require full reconstruction or major rehabilitation to become functional.

Definition and limits: “Hit”, “damaged”, “destroyed” and “unusable” are not interchangeable categories.

Established / documented

Health

By September 2026, 308 of 663 assessed health-service points were non-functioning, while most operating facilities were only partly functional.

Definition and limits: Facility status can change and does not measure the full loss of staff, medicines, equipment or access.

Established / documented

International law, in plain English

Distinction requires parties to distinguish civilians and civilian objects from combatants and military objectives. Proportionality does not compare the two sides’ total death tolls. It prohibits an attack when the expected incidental civilian harm would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated at the time. Precautions require feasible steps to verify targets, choose means and timing that reduce civilian harm, warn when circumstances permit, and cancel an attack if legal conditions are not met. violated these rules by deliberately attacking civilians, taking hostages and using indiscriminate rockets. Serious allegations against Israeli forces concern attacks on civilians and civilian objects, starvation, forced displacement, detention abuse and whether precautions and proportionality assessments were lawful in particular operations.

Institutional or legal finding

Genocide: allegation, findings and court status

is not simply a synonym for mass civilian killing. It requires one or more prohibited acts together with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group as such. The International Court of Justice has not ruled that Israel committed . In South Africa’s case against Israel, it issued binding in January, March and May 2024 intended to protect rights claimed under the Convention while the case proceeds. do not decide the merits. A UN Commission of Inquiry concluded in September 2025 that Israeli authorities and forces had committed . That is a formal investigative finding, not a final judgment by a court. Israel rejects the allegation, argues that it is targeting rather than Palestinians as a group, and disputes the evidence and intent analysis. The ICJ merits case remains the forum for an eventual judicial decision between the states.

ICJ

Disputes and legal responsibility between states. Its provisional measures are binding but are not a final genocide judgment.

ICC

Alleged criminal responsibility of individuals. Arrest warrants are not convictions.

Allegation, not a conviction

ICC: individual criminal allegations

The International Criminal Court is separate from the ICJ. In November 2024, ICC judges issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then Defence Minister Yoav Gallant, finding reasonable grounds to believe they bore criminal responsibility for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity. The Court also issued a warrant for military commander Mohammed Deif; proceedings against him ended after evidence of his death was accepted. Warrants are not convictions. They mean judges found the legal threshold for arrest had been met. Israel rejects the Court’s jurisdiction and the allegations.

A ceasefire stops the main war, not the conflict

Current

A US-brokered ceasefire took effect on 10 October 2025. The remaining 20 living Israeli hostages were released, Palestinian prisoners were freed, and Israeli forces withdrew to an agreed line inside Gaza. Full-scale warfare receded, but the agreement left the hardest political questions unsettled.

Last reviewed: 21 September 2026 · Check linked sources for dated figures and proceedings.

Why is there still no Palestinian state?

Current

Because every proposed route has collided with unresolved rights, incompatible security demands, unequal power and leaders who either could not or would not make an enforceable agreement.

Last reviewed: 21 September 2026 · Check linked sources for dated figures and proceedings.

Next

Okay. Now you know the story.

Explore the arguments, legal questions and words that shape the conversation.

Want to help?

Support humanitarian work for Palestinians.

Donate directly to organisations providing medical care and humanitarian assistance.

100% independent from this website. Donations are made directly through the organisations.

Give to charity